Pieces
  • |

Bits & Pieces?

Bits & Pieces

I’ve been thinking about the Ben Folds’ song “Bastard” lately. The chorus goes, “Why you gotta act like you know when you don’t know? It’s ok if you don’t know everything.” Those lyrics come to my mind when I encounter someone that strikes me as a know-it-all – someone that is clearly forcing an answer into the space of question just because the space exists.  And hey – it takes one to know one. I am this person on MANY occasions. It’s usually me reminding myself that it’s OK to just utter those three simple words: I don’t know. But I bet I’m not alone.  I’m sure this is rooted in how we were brought up as students – a focus on the answer more so than the process of discovering it. Plus, there’s just that amazing feeling of being right.

But one of the things that makes us know-it-alls annoying, as well as harmful, is that we’re not always right – or there’s no way to prove whether we are or we aren’t. Yet we hop into the answer hole so fast, we often (unintentionally on my part at least) discourage others from seeking another (equally or even, gasp! more right) answer.

Now before you think this is just some personal rant, let me make a connection. In an earlier post on agile development I referenced the somewhat controversial statement out of 37 Signals as they contend that the planning process that is part of most traditional development cycles is simply guessing  – and that guessing is dangerous. We also took a look at the difference between that traditional development cycle of Learn > Make > Test and the agile cycle of Make> Test> Learn.

In a traditional environment the learning is scheduled up front. A lot of good primary and secondary research is done and, when combined with our experience, produces valuable insights that then feed our strategy, design and execution. But these insights – much like the planning I believe 37 Signals had in mind – are really just (educated) guesses.  And unfortunately, those guesses serve as the “answer” deliverable and that task of seeking answers is often considered closed after that inital phase.

An agile environment certainly is not void of upfront research and insights – but there is focus on getting to them fast and treating them as valuable, but temporary. We’re forced to leave the space of the question open for a while and that can be uncomfortable! And it’s uncomfortable for most clients too! No one wants to say, “We’re not sure, let’s just try it and see.” But we have to. It’s the best chance our next website/social campaign/”killer app” has. The agile agency must fight to be metrics-driven – meaning learning and acting based on measuring the first build. Not just collecting the data, but genuinely seeking answers that potentially prove our insights wrong – and having the time and budget allocated to be iterative.

Now back to the song. I don’t think Folds is on any sort of personal rant either. I think he just wants to say that there is something very special – whimsical yet substantial – about discovering life’s truths – the details of which can be largely missed if we rush into knowing. Which, strangely, has amazing relevance to our lives in an agile agency.

  • |
  • http://twitter.com/addy_dren Andreana Drencheva

    Jacque,

    I have so many things to say on the topic and you and I have had some very interesting conversations. In my opinion, it all boils down to culture (internal and external). The external part is kind of obvious, we are hired for our knowledge and talent and it doesn’t make much sense to hire someone who doesn’t know. But that is the smaller problem. The bigger one is internal culture and our ability to recognize what we don’t know and admit it. It’s hard, especially in an environment where egomaniacs strive. But saying “I don’t know” doesn’t necessarily mean incompetence. On the contrary, not recognizing that you don’t know means incompetence. We need to be confident not in the individual pieces of information stored in our brains and computer files but in our approach to work. 

    And talking about knowledge, read “No One Knows What the F*** They’re Doing (or “The 3 Types of Knowledge”)” by Steve Schwartz (link: http://jangosteve.com/post/380926251/no-one-knows-what-theyre-doing).

    He says that knowledge falls in three categories: 1.) shit you know, 2.) shit you know you don’t know and 3.) shit you don’t know you don’t know. He claims that the second category should be the largest one. Good read.

    • Jacque

      Addy, TOTALLY agree and appreciate the incompetence comment. Very good, that will resonate with me for quite some time. And the song goes on, “the more he knew he knew he didn’t know shit.”  - the awareness of it being a catalyst. Thanks girl, more conversations to come I hope! 

  • Anonymous

    Great, super smart post, Jacque. And I totally agree with you, and with Addy’s point about culture. Agile is absolutely a culture thing. But yes we are constrained to some extent based on what clients come to us for, which is “knowing.” Also, most marketer’s budgets just aren’t set up to allow for much experimentation. How do we change that?  I have no answers. Just questions. Things I know I don’t know. : ) 

    • Jacque

      Thanks Sue! Yeah – we definitely have our work cut out for us in order to shift the perception of the learning from experimenation (risky and doubted) to iteration (calculated and trusted). And most marketer’s budgets are set up that way because most marketer’s budgets are based on traditional media buys. An ongoing – and exciting – challenge for sure!  

  • Pingback: Jigsaw LLCThe make, test, learn agile cycle. And how it relates to moving.

  • Art and Design
  • Branding and Marketing
  • Culture and Observations
  • Jigsaw and Work
  • Media and Technology